Skip to main content

national security

2 articles found

Trump Bans Anthropic as OpenAI Wins Pentagon Deal

The Trump administration has ordered every federal agency to immediately cease all use of Anthropic's artificial intelligence technology, marking an extraordinary escalation in tensions between the White House and one of the world's most valuable AI companies. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth designated Anthropic a "Supply-Chain Risk to National Security" — a label typically reserved for foreign adversaries — making it the first American company to receive such treatment. The dispute centers on Anthropic's insistence on two safeguards for military use of its AI models: no mass surveillance of American citizens, and no fully autonomous weapons systems without human oversight. Hours after the ban was announced, rival OpenAI struck its own deal with the Pentagon — one that CEO Sam Altman said includes the very same restrictions Anthropic had sought. The confrontation has sent shockwaves through the technology sector and raised fundamental questions about the relationship between the federal government and the AI industry, the limits of executive power over private companies, and the ethical guardrails that should govern military applications of artificial intelligence.

AnthropicOpenAIPentagon

News: Trump Bans Anthropic From Government Use and Pentagon

President Trump ordered all federal agencies to immediately cease using Anthropic's artificial intelligence technology on Friday, capping an increasingly bitter dispute between the AI company and the Pentagon over whether military contractors can set limits on how their technology is deployed in warfare. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth followed through on his threat to designate Anthropic a supply chain risk to national security — a classification traditionally reserved for foreign adversaries like China's Huawei — effectively blacklisting the $380 billion AI company from military work. Within hours of Trump's announcement, rival OpenAI struck a deal with the Defense Department to deploy its own AI models on classified networks, positioning itself as the Pentagon's preferred AI partner. The rapid sequence of events marks the most dramatic confrontation between a U.S. technology company and the federal government since the battles over encryption in the 1990s, with profound implications for the AI industry's relationship with government, the trajectory of military AI adoption, and the valuations of companies preparing for public offerings. At the center of the dispute are two questions that will define AI's role in national defense for decades: whether AI companies can prevent their tools from being used for mass surveillance of American citizens, and whether today's AI models are reliable enough to make lethal targeting decisions without human oversight.

AnthropicOpenAIPentagon